<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogRush, You&#8217;re Kidding Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/</link>
	<description>tamar weinberg is a digital marketing specialist, social media consultant, and tech geek at heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:06:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogrush Inactive - They&#8217;ve Got That Right.</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-51779</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogrush Inactive - They&#8217;ve Got That Right.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-51779</guid>
		<description>[...] Tamar Weinberg put it more politely when she said &#8220;Blogrush, You&#8217;re Kidding Me.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tamar Weinberg put it more politely when she said &#8220;Blogrush, You&#8217;re Kidding Me.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-38637</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-38637</guid>
		<description>Was willing to try this thing out but it wouldn&#039;t even install, instead leaving a big blank section with a small BR image at its center. Admin have taken way too long to answer my queries so I began more research on the widget. Turns out it is not that popular anywhere so I don&#039;t want to be a part of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was willing to try this thing out but it wouldn&#8217;t even install, instead leaving a big blank section with a small BR image at its center. Admin have taken way too long to answer my queries so I began more research on the widget. Turns out it is not that popular anywhere so I don&#8217;t want to be a part of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-36366</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 08:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-36366</guid>
		<description>Tried BlogRush. Horrible traffic generation. Haven&#039;t been able to log in to my account there for over a week. Their support has not gotten back to me since I reported it a week ago. I took the widget out and wont be using them again.

-- Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried BlogRush. Horrible traffic generation. Haven&#8217;t been able to log in to my account there for over a week. Their support has not gotten back to me since I reported it a week ago. I took the widget out and wont be using them again.</p>
<p>&#8211; Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buyers web make money online blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-33638</link>
		<dc:creator>buyers web make money online blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-33638</guid>
		<description>It appears google search engine has penalised blog rush for the term &quot;blog rush&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears google search engine has penalised blog rush for the term &#8220;blog rush&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LC</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-26757</link>
		<dc:creator>LC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-26757</guid>
		<description>I finally removed my BR widget yesterday. The idea and algo are good in theory, but due to our specialty nature our site had little contextual matching with the category topic contents. Once he gains a true enterprise critical mass, I&#039;d look at it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally removed my BR widget yesterday. The idea and algo are good in theory, but due to our specialty nature our site had little contextual matching with the category topic contents. Once he gains a true enterprise critical mass, I&#8217;d look at it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idetrorce</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-26305</link>
		<dc:creator>Idetrorce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-26305</guid>
		<description>very interesting, but I don&#039;t agree with you 
Idetrorce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, but I don&#8217;t agree with you<br />
Idetrorce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Customers More Sales</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-25125</link>
		<dc:creator>More Customers More Sales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-25125</guid>
		<description>I got banned pretty quick, probably because my blogs are new and did not have 10 posts yet. No problem with that.

The problem is there is no way on the blogrush site to request re-evaluation and they don&#039;t answer emails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got banned pretty quick, probably because my blogs are new and did not have 10 posts yet. No problem with that.</p>
<p>The problem is there is no way on the blogrush site to request re-evaluation and they don&#8217;t answer emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The End of Blogrush &#124; WordPress Designpraxis</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-22530</link>
		<dc:creator>The End of Blogrush &#124; WordPress Designpraxis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 08:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-22530</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BlogRush, You’re Kidding Me BlogRush amoebas ban high quality blogs in favor of crap It Ain’t No Cure For BlogRash Farewell BlogRush Blogrush is a scam BlogRush was a waste of time Avoid BlogRush like the plague [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please buck up, BlogRush! at BlogMunch</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-22490</link>
		<dc:creator>Please buck up, BlogRush! at BlogMunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-22490</guid>
		<description>[...] We are to blamed you have to work so hard to &#8220;manually&#8221; review and remove over 10,000 &#8220;low quality&#8221; blogs? Isn&#8217;t these things done in the first place before you had your GRAND opening? Now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We are to blamed you have to work so hard to &#8220;manually&#8221; review and remove over 10,000 &#8220;low quality&#8221; blogs? Isn&#8217;t these things done in the first place before you had your GRAND opening? Now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-22305</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/deactivated-by-blogrush/#comment-22305</guid>
		<description>BlogRush is overblown. I got suspicious of it when all of these Sphinn posts appeared giving it a positive spin -- I couldn&#039;t see how it could possibly receive such good press, being so new.

You have confirmed my suspicions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BlogRush is overblown. I got suspicious of it when all of these Sphinn posts appeared giving it a positive spin &#8212; I couldn&#8217;t see how it could possibly receive such good press, being so new.</p>
<p>You have confirmed my suspicions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.techipedia.com

Served from: www.techipedia.com @ 2012-02-11 08:14:56 -->
