<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Nobody Should Buy Digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/</link>
	<description>tamar weinberg is a social media consultant and tech geek at heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:07:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blackhatseo blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-109813</link>
		<dc:creator>blackhatseo blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-109813</guid>
		<description>actualyl i never liked digg. reddit used to be cool.. but now seems only stumbleupon counts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actualyl i never liked digg. reddit used to be cool.. but now seems only stumbleupon counts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disaster: The Failure Of Digg To Report Anything Newsworthy</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-94388</link>
		<dc:creator>Disaster: The Failure Of Digg To Report Anything Newsworthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-94388</guid>
		<description>[...] Story Number 3: Give Us The Money&#8220;Oh, what&#8217;s that, you said you wanted the top stories democratically Dugg by users like yourself? Sorry, we thought you said you wanted to see things major corporations paid us to show you!&#8221; Still, that&#8217;s an easy mistake to make &#8211; especially when you&#8217;ve been trying to sell your site for a couple of years to Google, only to find that nobody wants to buy Digg due to all its inherent problems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Story Number 3: Give Us The Money&#8220;Oh, what&#8217;s that, you said you wanted the top stories democratically Dugg by users like yourself? Sorry, we thought you said you wanted to see things major corporations paid us to show you!&#8221; Still, that&#8217;s an easy mistake to make &#8211; especially when you&#8217;ve been trying to sell your site for a couple of years to Google, only to find that nobody wants to buy Digg due to all its inherent problems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can You Digg It? I Knew That You Could &#171; Dallas Public Relations Expert Scott Baradell&#8217;s Media Orchard</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-65735</link>
		<dc:creator>Can You Digg It? I Knew That You Could &#171; Dallas Public Relations Expert Scott Baradell&#8217;s Media Orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-65735</guid>
		<description>[...] a half now, we haven&#8217;t exactly been an active user. But now that Digg is embroiled in so much controversy, and virtually every client is asking about the site, I decided I should at least play around with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a half now, we haven&#8217;t exactly been an active user. But now that Digg is embroiled in so much controversy, and virtually every client is asking about the site, I decided I should at least play around with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donde Digg fracasa, hay un éxito para StumbleUpon &#124; Mashable</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-56866</link>
		<dc:creator>Donde Digg fracasa, hay un éxito para StumbleUpon &#124; Mashable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-56866</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] violaciones a los términos de uso. Por ello, estos sitios sociales de noticias incurren en la  ira de muchos de los usuarios de la comunidad de sitios sociales de noticias, publicistas independientes, así como también comerciantes, y a veces con [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where Digg Fails, A Success for StumbleUpon</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-56790</link>
		<dc:creator>Where Digg Fails, A Success for StumbleUpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-56790</guid>
		<description>[...] activity or other terms of use violations. Because of this, these social news sites incur the ire of many users in the social news community, independent publishers, as well as marketers, and often rightfully [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] activity or other terms of use violations. Because of this, these social news sites incur the ire of many users in the social news community, independent publishers, as well as marketers, and often rightfully [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knud</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-51663</link>
		<dc:creator>knud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-51663</guid>
		<description>Hi

I am working on a site which try to solve many of the problems with digg.com.
You can find it on http://crowdnews.eu.

The main problem with digg is the voting system.
When only top voted stories get on the front page it has 
to be a subject that many can relate to, 
which result in stories with a low information content.

Crowdnews solves this by using sharing instead of voting.
Every have a personal news page on which they can subscribe to other users and when those users share stories they will appear on the personal news page.  
 

  
Join me on CrowdNews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I am working on a site which try to solve many of the problems with digg.com.<br />
You can find it on <a href="http://crowdnews.eu" rel="nofollow">http://crowdnews.eu</a>.</p>
<p>The main problem with digg is the voting system.<br />
When only top voted stories get on the front page it has<br />
to be a subject that many can relate to,<br />
which result in stories with a low information content.</p>
<p>Crowdnews solves this by using sharing instead of voting.<br />
Every have a personal news page on which they can subscribe to other users and when those users share stories they will appear on the personal news page.  </p>
<p>Join me on CrowdNews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why hasn&#8217;t Digg made any progress? It&#8217;s worth only $164M now &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-51334</link>
		<dc:creator>Why hasn&#8217;t Digg made any progress? It&#8217;s worth only $164M now &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-51334</guid>
		<description>[...] photo via techipedia]       Tags: co:Digg, inv:Greylock, inv:Highland-Capital-Partners, inv:Omidyar-Network   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] photo via techipedia]       Tags: co:Digg, inv:Greylock, inv:Highland-Capital-Partners, inv:Omidyar-Network   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USB Drive</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-44674</link>
		<dc:creator>USB Drive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-44674</guid>
		<description>Nice - now Valleywag linked to ya. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &#8211; now Valleywag linked to ya. <img src='http://www.techipedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdITjobs.com : : Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to Prepare Yourself for the New Year: Eight Year End Optimization Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-39313</link>
		<dc:creator>bdITjobs.com : : Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to Prepare Yourself for the New Year: Eight Year End Optimization Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-39313</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on social media websites and that’s something I’m reducing next year. Social media sites like Digg don’t care about their users. If I take the time I’ve spent on them and convert it to time on my own sites, I can easily make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Open Letter to StumbleUpon Regarding Usability, Negativity, and Growing Pains &#124; eMoms at Home</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-33461</link>
		<dc:creator>An Open Letter to StumbleUpon Regarding Usability, Negativity, and Growing Pains &#124; eMoms at Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/dont-buy-digg/#comment-33461</guid>
		<description>[...] that the reason StumbleUpon has grown so rapidly is because they have been able to shine where Digg has failed, and have been able to capture a large percentage of a market that once belonged to Kevin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the reason StumbleUpon has grown so rapidly is because they have been able to shine where Digg has failed, and have been able to capture a large percentage of a market that once belonged to Kevin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: www.techipedia.com @ 2010-03-17 23:48:10 -->