<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 23 Community Reactions to the New Digg: Outlook Not Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/</link>
	<description>tamar weinberg is a digital marketing specialist, social media consultant, and tech geek at heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:06:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg vs. Reddit: Reddit's Staff is Better Â» Techipedia &#124; Tamar Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-154462</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg vs. Reddit: Reddit's Staff is Better Â» Techipedia &#124; Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-154462</guid>
		<description>[...] scheduled downtime. (I&#8217;ve asked for that before, Mr. Rose.) It would help prevent posts like these. Better yet, the fact that they show that they listen (beyond for damage control purposes) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scheduled downtime. (I&#8217;ve asked for that before, Mr. Rose.) It would help prevent posts like these. Better yet, the fact that they show that they listen (beyond for damage control purposes) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Privacy is an Illusion on Digg Â» Techipedia &#124; Tamar Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-150043</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Privacy is an Illusion on Digg Â» Techipedia &#124; Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-150043</guid>
		<description>[...]   ShareWhen Digg came out with its new social features, some folks applauded the move while others despised it. Nearly four months later, the social features appear to be here to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   ShareWhen Digg came out with its new social features, some folks applauded the move while others despised it. Nearly four months later, the social features appear to be here to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Review of the New Digg Images and Universal Taxonomy Implementation Â» Techipedia &#124; Tamar Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-146499</link>
		<dc:creator>A Review of the New Digg Images and Universal Taxonomy Implementation Â» Techipedia &#124; Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-146499</guid>
		<description>[...] Digg launched its highly anticipated images section. And while you&#8217;ve all come to expect my rants about Digg, I simply cannot deliver that this time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digg launched its highly anticipated images section. And while you&#8217;ve all come to expect my rants about Digg, I simply cannot deliver that this time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confessions and Reflections of a Former Digg Addict Â» Techipedia &#124; Tamar Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-104157</link>
		<dc:creator>Confessions and Reflections of a Former Digg Addict Â» Techipedia &#124; Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-104157</guid>
		<description>[...] is a confessional blog post, and I totally hear you. In fact, it made for a few months of vehement blog posts about Digg on this blog that were hugely controversial but also incredibly well-received by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a confessional blog post, and I totally hear you. In fact, it made for a few months of vehement blog posts about Digg on this blog that were hugely controversial but also incredibly well-received by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter as Collective Intelligence and Talk of the Nation &#124; Rhea Drysdale</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-47336</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter as Collective Intelligence and Talk of the Nation &#124; Rhea Drysdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-47336</guid>
		<description>[...] popping up. Tamar took those comments from Twitter, IM, Pownce and Sphinn and created a post: 23 Community Reactions to the New Digg. The reaction was fast and furious, but provided a telling look at top users, the Digg community [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] popping up. Tamar took those comments from Twitter, IM, Pownce and Sphinn and created a post: 23 Community Reactions to the New Digg. The reaction was fast and furious, but provided a telling look at top users, the Digg community [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikas</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-45583</link>
		<dc:creator>vikas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-45583</guid>
		<description>Its not the same digg as it used to be ... we dont want another community site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not the same digg as it used to be &#8230; we dont want another community site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdITjobs.com : : Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Doshy Link Attack! Social Media, Word of Mouth, Wordpress Themes and Usability</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-39316</link>
		<dc:creator>bdITjobs.com : : Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Doshy Link Attack! Social Media, Word of Mouth, Wordpress Themes and Usability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-39316</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently underwent a redesign and some members of the Digg community don’t really like it. I don’t fancy the changes as well because it really makes it a lot harder to follow the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Ketsdever</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-30269</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Ketsdever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-30269</guid>
		<description>Digg users need to be able to tag themselves for the types of stories they like  (the 5 categories on the side are radically insufficient).  In fact you should be able to send out shouts based on the tags, so that you don&#039;t effectively send spam to a bunch of folks who don&#039;t want to hear about your story.  

Sure there may be some exceptions to this...but overall tagging would be a massive help.  Chris Messina also makes the same argument about Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg users need to be able to tag themselves for the types of stories they like  (the 5 categories on the side are radically insufficient).  In fact you should be able to send out shouts based on the tags, so that you don&#8217;t effectively send spam to a bunch of folks who don&#8217;t want to hear about your story.  </p>
<p>Sure there may be some exceptions to this&#8230;but overall tagging would be a massive help.  Chris Messina also makes the same argument about Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartelizing Digg: The Numbers Are In! &#124; Royal HeHe2-ness!</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-30113</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartelizing Digg: The Numbers Are In! &#124; Royal HeHe2-ness!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-30113</guid>
		<description>[...] even super users! And that&#8217;s just the tip of the iceberg, techipdia.com compiled a list of 23 complaints from the community and even went as far as &#8220;Why Nobody Should Buy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even super users! And that&#8217;s just the tip of the iceberg, techipdia.com compiled a list of 23 complaints from the community and even went as far as &#8220;Why Nobody Should Buy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Nobody Should Buy Digg » techipedia &#124; tamar weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-26803</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Nobody Should Buy Digg » techipedia &#124; tamar weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/new-digg-community-reaction/#comment-26803</guid>
		<description>[...] the founder himself. We also know that Digg is seriously broken (and it has been for the last three months). Why should anyone put their eggs in a leaky basket? Digg needs to do two things before it even [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the founder himself. We also know that Digg is seriously broken (and it has been for the last three months). Why should anyone put their eggs in a leaky basket? Digg needs to do two things before it even [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.techipedia.com

Served from: www.techipedia.com @ 2012-02-11 08:28:15 -->
