<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the New Digg Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/</link>
	<description>tamar weinberg is a social media consultant and tech geek at heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How Digg Castrated My Friends</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-97835</link>
		<dc:creator>How Digg Castrated My Friends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-97835</guid>
		<description>[...] applauded the move toward a more facebook like model. However other people who do use Digg called the update what it truly was, a mistake. Not to worry the Digg editorial staff squelched the negative feedback and continued on the path [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] applauded the move toward a more facebook like model. However other people who do use Digg called the update what it truly was, a mistake. Not to worry the Digg editorial staff squelched the negative feedback and continued on the path [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Altersvorsorge</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-96841</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Altersvorsorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-96841</guid>
		<description>Digg is a very special world in internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg is a very special world in internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-90107</link>
		<dc:creator>Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-90107</guid>
		<description>Who will get burned on Digg today? Random banning, where you even there? Did they reply to your email so you could recover 4 years of stories submitted? THe answer is...

Possible yes.
Probably yes.
Possibly not
Not a chance
Hell no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who will get burned on Digg today? Random banning, where you even there? Did they reply to your email so you could recover 4 years of stories submitted? THe answer is&#8230;</p>
<p>Possible yes.<br />
Probably yes.<br />
Possibly not<br />
Not a chance<br />
Hell no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg’s Recent Bans and the Limits of Crowdsourcing &#160;&#187;TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-49226</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg’s Recent Bans and the Limits of Crowdsourcing &#160;&#187;TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-49226</guid>
		<description>[...] stories significantly less accessible and to require more clickthroughs, a move that was widely decried by power users and which inadvertently led to the script situation that it is currently caught up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stories significantly less accessible and to require more clickthroughs, a move that was widely decried by power users and which inadvertently led to the script situation that it is currently caught up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg’s Recent Bans and the Limits of Crowdsourcing - Mashable</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-49223</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg’s Recent Bans and the Limits of Crowdsourcing - Mashable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-49223</guid>
		<description>[...] stories significantly less accessible and to require more clickthroughs, a move that was widely decried by power users and which inadvertently led to the script situation that it is currently caught up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stories significantly less accessible and to require more clickthroughs, a move that was widely decried by power users and which inadvertently led to the script situation that it is currently caught up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knud</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-47872</link>
		<dc:creator>knud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-47872</guid>
		<description>Hi

I am working on a site which try to solve many of the problems with digg.com.
You can find it on http://crowdnews.eu.

The main problem with digg is the voting system.
When only top voted stories get on the front page it has 
to be a subject that many can relate to, 
which result in stories with a low information content.

http://crowdnews.eu solves this by using sharing instead of voting.
Every have a personal news page on which they can subscribe to other users and when those users share stories they will appear on the personal news page.  
 

  
Crowdnews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I am working on a site which try to solve many of the problems with digg.com.<br />
You can find it on <a href="http://crowdnews.eu" rel="nofollow">http://crowdnews.eu</a>.</p>
<p>The main problem with digg is the voting system.<br />
When only top voted stories get on the front page it has<br />
to be a subject that many can relate to,<br />
which result in stories with a low information content.</p>
<p><a href="http://crowdnews.eu" rel="nofollow">http://crowdnews.eu</a> solves this by using sharing instead of voting.<br />
Every have a personal news page on which they can subscribe to other users and when those users share stories they will appear on the personal news page.  </p>
<p>Crowdnews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech News Beta :: The Sandbox</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-46890</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Beta :: The Sandbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 06:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-46890</guid>
		<description>[...] Breaking News How Digg SUX [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Breaking News How Digg SUX [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-42247</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-42247</guid>
		<description>Just for fun I decided to Digg this article. Guess what - the word must be out - &quot;Cool this story has been submitted&quot;  
There was only one story and completely unrelated. It only had one Digg.
Seems like someone is manipulating Digg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for fun I decided to Digg this article. Guess what &#8211; the word must be out &#8211; &#8220;Cool this story has been submitted&#8221;<br />
There was only one story and completely unrelated. It only had one Digg.<br />
Seems like someone is manipulating Digg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-37737</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-37737</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t know if I like the new style of Digg or how it works. I have&#039;nt decided yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t know if I like the new style of Digg or how it works. I have&#8217;nt decided yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamar Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-34948</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techipedia.com/2007/why-the-new-digg-sucks/#comment-34948</guid>
		<description>Actually, the question is &quot;what happened in September?&quot; 

The answer is in the post.  I hope you read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the question is &#8220;what happened in September?&#8221; </p>
<p>The answer is in the post.  I hope you read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: www.techipedia.com @ 2010-03-17 04:07:45 -->