December 1, 2006
According to the 2006 GenX2Z Anderson Analytics survey (PDF link), the top five websites of choice by college students are:
- MySpace (13% of visits, a 258% increase from 2005)
- facebook.com (11.5%, a 41% increase from 2005)
- youtube.com (4.5%, with no data from 2005 recorded)
- collegehumor.com (3.7%, a 61% decrease from 2005)
- Google.com (3.7%, a 13% decrease from 2005)
That puts Google, Inc. in two of the top ten spots, making any community-oriented website envious of the search engine that also seems to be faring quite well in social networking too.
Does it come as any surprise that Google is the employer of choice by college students? According to another recent survey on CollegeGrad.com, almost half — 49% — of students would rather work at Google than Microsoft (29%) or Yahoo (12%).
Could they score a job? Maybe, if Google really is getting easier on hiring.
So — why do college students want to work at Google?
This is a preview of College Statistics 2006: MySpace, Facebook, YouTube, Google!.
Read the full post (261 words, 2 images, estimated 1:03 mins reading time)
Read the full article →
November 15, 2006
With yesterday being the Microsoft Zune official release and the fact that people are adamant about getting a Zune over all other such products out there, I’ve begun questioning how and why people choose to support certain brands.
From recent Hitwise data, Google accounts for over 60% of search. Why doesn’t Google have more than 60% or closer to 70% or even 100%? Is it because the other approximately 40% believe that their search engine of choice is superior (which could very well be the case)? Do they hate the Google ads and not want to see them? Do the others simply not know about Google? Do they dislike monopolies? Or do these individuals in the minority simply not want to support the Google brand on principle?
Consider the hype surrounded by Microsoft (which I noticed was most prevalent in the Windows 98 era). Everyone
chanted “Microsoft sucks,” though everyone continued buying Microsoft products and we saw no shortage or significant shifts that evidenced a market shift to something “superior.” Why is this so? Microsoft is what was easiest for everyone. Windows was what worked. Windows had more compatible applications, whereas other competing operating systems (MacOS, Linux) simply did not. Microsoft was the winning brand, but we still saw people, albeit in small numbers, change course.
Read the full article →
Digital Marketing Specialist, Social Media Consultant,
and Tech Geek at Heart